Proper Storage of MIG Guns and Consumables
As with any piece of equipment in the shop or on the jobsite, proper storage and care of MIG guns and welding consumables are important. These may seem like rather insignificant components at first, but they can have a big impact on productivity, costs, weld quality and even safety.
MIG guns and consumables (e.g. contact tips, nozzles, liners and gas diffusers) that are not properly stored or maintained can pick up dirt, debris and oil, which can hinder gas flow during the welding process and lead to contamination of the weld. Proper storage and care is especially important in humid environments or on jobsites near water, such as shipyards, since exposure to moisture can lead to corrosion of welding guns and consumables — particularly the MIG gun liner. Proper storage of MIG guns, cables and consumables not only helps protect the equipment from damage, but it also improves jobsite safety.
Common mistakes
Leaving MIG guns or consumables lying on the floor or the ground can lead to tripping hazards that can negatively impact worker safety. It also can cause damage to the welding cables, which could be cut or torn by workplace equipment, such as forklifts. The risk of picking up contaminants is greater if the gun is left on the ground, and can lead to poor welding performance and possibly a shorter life span.
It is not uncommon for some welding operators to place the whole MIG gun nozzle and neck into a metal tube for storage. However, this practice puts extra force on the nozzle and/or front end of the gun each time the welding operator removes it from the tube. This action can cause broken parts or nicks on the nozzle where spatter can adhere, causing poor shielding gas flow, poor weld quality and downtime for rework.
Another common storage mistake is to hang the MIG gun by its trigger. This practice will naturally change the activation point for the way the trigger level engages the switch. Over time, the MIG gun will not start in the same manner because the welding operator will have to pull the trigger progressively harder each time. Ultimately, the trigger will no longer function properly (or at all) and will require replacement.
Any of these common, but poor, storage practices can weaken the MIG gun and/or consumables, leading to poor performance that impacts productivity, quality and costs.
Tips for MIG gun storage
For proper storage of MIG guns, keep them out of the dirt; avoid hanging them in a way that could cause damage to the cable or trigger; and keep them in a safe, out-of-the-way location. Welding operators should coil the MIG gun and cable into as small of a loop as possible for storage — make sure it’s not dragging or hanging in the path of high traffic areas.
Use a gun hanger when possible for storage, and take care that the gun is hanging from near the handle and that the neck is in the air, as opposed to pointing downward. If a gun hanger is not available, coil the cable and place the MIG gun on an elevated tube, so that gun and cable is off the floor and away from debris and dirt.
Depending on the environment, welding operators may choose to coil the MIG gun and lay it flat on an elevated surface. When implementing this measure, make sure the neck is at the topmost vertical point after coiling the gun.
Also, minimize a MIG gun’s exposure to the atmosphere when it’s not being used for welding. Doing so can help keep this equipment in good working condition for longer.
Consumables storage and handling
MIG gun consumables benefit from proper storage and handling, as well. A few best practices can help to achieve a high-quality weld and maintain productivity.
Storing consumables, unwrapped, in a bin — especially nozzles — can lead to scratching that can negatively impact performance and cause spatter to adhere more readily. Keep these and other consumables, such as liners and contact tips, in their original, sealed packaging until they are ready for use. Doing so helps protect the consumables from moisture, dirt and other debris that can damage them and minimizes the opportunity to cause poor weld quality. The longer consumables are protected from the atmosphere, the better they will perform — contact tips and nozzles that are not stored properly can wear before they are even used.
Always wear gloves when handling consumables. Oil and dirt from the welding operator’s hands can contaminate them and lead to problems in the weld.
When installing MIG gun liners, avoid uncoiling the liner and letting it drag on the floor when feeding it through the gun. When that happens, any contaminants on the floor will push through the MIG gun and have the potential to impede gas flow, shielding gas coverage and wire feeding — all factors that can lead to quality issues, downtime and potentially, cost for rework. Instead, use both hands: Hold the gun in one hand and uncoil the liner naturally with the other hand while feeding it through the gun.
Small steps for success
Proper storage of MIG guns and consumables can seem like a small issue, especially in a large shop or jobsite. However, it can have a great effect on costs, productivity and weld quality. Damaged equipment and consumables can lead to shorter product life, rework of welds and increased downtime for maintenance and replacement.
While only one part of a much larger system, the contact tip in both robotic and semi-automatic welding MIG guns plays a critical role in providing sound weld quality. It can also factor measurably into the productivity and profitability of a welding operation — downtime for excessive changeover can be detrimental to throughput, and the cost for labor and inventory. The major functions of a contact tip are to guide the welding wire and transfer the welding current to the wire as it passes through the bore. The goal is to have the wire feed through the contact tip smoothly, while maintaining maximum contact. To get the best results, it is important to have the right contact tip size —or inner diameter (ID) — for the application. The welding wire and welding process both influence the selection.
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes There are many considerations that factor into a company’s ability to achieve the best quality and highest productivity in the welding operation. Everything from selecting the right power source and welding process to the organization of the weld cell and workflow play a role in that success. Although a smaller part of the whole operation, MIG guns also play an important part. In addition to being responsible for delivering the current to create the arc that generates the weld, MIG guns are also the one piece of equipment that directly impacts the welding operator — day in and day out, shift after shift. The heat of the gun, along with the weight and repetitive motion of welding make it necessary to find the right gun to improve comfort and allow the welding operator the opportunity to put his or her best skills forward. With that in mind, MIG gun manufacturers throughout the industry have identified ways to make MIG guns more ergonomic and perform better. Changes that help expedite welding operator training and improve the welding environment also continue to emerge, as do MIG guns designed to reduce costs. Manufacturers continue to build features into MIG guns to help welding operators gain the highest level of quality, while also assisting them in producing a greater level of throughput. While it may seem like a minor advancement, the addition of a swivel at the base of the MIG gun handle has become an important feature that contributes positively to welding operator comfort and productivity. MIG guns that provide a 360-degree swivel offer greater maneuverability for accessing weld joints and are less fatiguing to adjust throughout the course of a welding shift. This feature also reduces the strain on the power cable, resulting in less downtime and costs for changeover. The addition of rubber handle over-molding, which is becoming more popular in industrial settings, can further improve MIG gun ergonomics by providing welding operators with a more secure and comfortable grip. The over-molding can also help reduce vibrations during the welding process, minimizing hand and wrist fatigue. MIG gun manufacturers are also adding in features to their products that help minimize costs. Liners that require no measurement during installation and are locked at the front and back of the gun are one example. The liner locks and trim accuracy prevent gaps forming along the wire feed path between the ends of the liner and the contact tip and power pin. Gaps can lead to birdnesting, burnbacks and erratic arc — issues that often result in wasted time spent troubleshooting and/or reworking the weld. As companies seek out ways to address environmental regulations and create a safer, cleaner and more compliant welding operation, fume extraction guns have increased in popularity. These guns capture weld fume and visible smoke right at the source, over and around the weld pool. They operate by way of a vacuum chamber that suctions the fumes through the handle of the gun, into the gun’s hose through to a port on the filtration system. While effective in helping remove weld fume, fume extraction guns in the past have been rather heavy and bulky; they are larger than standard MIG guns in order to accommodate the vacuum chamber and the extraction hose. This extra bulk could increase welding operator fatigue and limit his or her ability to maneuver around the welding application. Manufacturers today offer fume extraction guns that are smaller (near the size of a standard MIG gun) and that feature swiveled handles to make them easier to manage. Some fume extraction guns now also feature adjustable extraction control regulators at the front of the gun handle. These allow welding operators to easily balance suction with shielding gas flow to protect against porosity. As the fabrication and manufacturing industries evolve, companies need to seek out welding equipment that can meet those changing demands — and no single MIG gun can do the job for every application. To ensure companies have the exact MIG gun necessary, many manufacturers have moved toward configurable products. Typical configurator options include: amperage, cable type and length, handle type (straight or curved), and neck length and angle. These configurators also offer the option to select the type of contact tip and MIG gun liners. Upon selecting the desired features for a given MIG gun, companies can purchase the unique part number through a welding distributor. MIG gun performance can also be augmented by the selection of accessories. Flexible necks, for example, can save labor and time by allowing the welding operator to rotate or bend the neck to the desired angle. Neck grips can add to operator comfort by reducing heat exposure and helping the welding operator maintain a steady position, leading to less fatigue and better weld quality. With the advent of advanced welding information management systems — software-driven solutions that gather weld data and can monitor most every aspect of the welding process — specialized MIG guns with a built-interface have also been introduced to the marketplace. These guns pair with the weld sequencing functions of the welding information management system, using the screen to guide the welding operator through the order and placement of each weld. Similarly, some welding performance training systems feature MIG guns with built-in displays that provide visual feedback regarding proper gun angle, travel speeds and more, allowing the welding operator to make corrections as he or she trains. Both types of guns have been designed to help streamline welding operator training and, like other MIG guns in today’s marketplace, can help support the creation of high-quality welds and positive levels of productivity in the welding operation.
As companies seek out means to increase productivity and improve quality, the investment in welding automation continues to grow across the fabrication and manufacturing industries. Along with providing greater efficiencies, robotic welding systems allow companies to streamline their operations to gain cost savings and to position themselves favorably among the competition. Selecting the right robot and power source, and ensuring that the parts to be welded lend themselves to automation — namely that they are repeatable and offer joint accessibility — are all vital to success. There are also steps that companies can take to optimize the robotic welding process by way of the robotic gas metal arc welding (GMAW) gun. From making the proper selection for the application to implementing appropriate preventive maintenance and more, this component can help support greater arc-on time, reduce costs and help companies realize the benefits of welding automation. Determining the right robotic GMAW gun depends on the application, including the type and thickness of material being welded, the length of the weld and the amperage required. The type of robotic welding system also factors into the decision, as through-arm robots are becoming more prevalent in the industry and replacing many conventional robots due to their ability to reduce cable wear from routine torsion. In this case, a through-arm robotic GMAW gun, in which the cable assembly runs through the arm of the robot (as opposed to over it), is necessary. As with conventional GMAW guns, through-arm style guns are available in air- or water-cooled varieties. In most applications, air-cooled GMAW guns provide the necessary cooling capacity to protect against premature failure and offer good performance. These guns rely on both the copper in the unicable and the ambient air for cooling. In addition to working well on lower amperage applications, for welding materials up to 0.16-inch thick and for short, high-volume welds, air-cooled GMAW guns are also quite sturdy. In heavy equipment manufacturing and similar industries, water-cooled robotic GMAW guns are often chosen due to their ability to weld on thicker materials (over 1/4 inch) for longer periods of time. While more expensive up front and more to maintain, these guns offer high amperages (usually 300 to 600 amps) at 100 percent duty cycle, which makes them well suited for long weldments. These GMAW guns operate by circulating coolant from a radiator unit through the power cable via cooling hoses and through the gun and neck. This coolant returns to the radiator where it releases the heat that it absorbed during the welding process. Because of the water circuit, there is the potential for leaks so companies should take care to implement a preventive maintenance schedule to help protect against issues. In the event that a company welds materials of a variety of thicknesses at low and high amperages, a good choice for a GMAW gun is a hybrid variety featuring a durable air-cooled neck with external water lines. The neck, power cable and other components chosen for a robotic GMAW gun can have a measurable impact on welding performance and productivity. The goal with each of these items is to keep them functioning correctly and prevent premature failure so that the robot can maintain the high levels of arc-on time it was designed to provide. It is important that the robotic GMAW gun is able to access the weld joint accurately and fully, and utilizing the proper neck style and length for the job is key. Typically, GMAW gun manufacturers offer necks in multiple angles ranging from 22 to 180 degrees, and in various lengths to accommodate most robotic welding applications. In some cases, however, it may be necessary to special-order a neck. Whichever the case, having a neck that can reach the weld joint appropriately can reduce weld defects by completing the weld properly the first time, and eliminate downtime for rework. The right power cable style and length on a robotic GMAW can also help companies achieve efficiencies in the robotic welding operation. In a through-arm robotic application, the selection is simpler, as the power cable is typically sold in set lengths to match a specific make and model of robot. Still, companies may want to consider additional options for these components, such as power cables with a rotating connection. This feature helps relieve stress on the cable and power pin, resulting in less kinking and a longer life. For conventional robots, selecting the correct length of power cable is important — too long of a cable can easily kink or whip around during the welding process, whereas too short of a cable can stretch and wear more quickly. Both can result in premature cable failure, and downtime and costs for cable replacement. When in doubt about the selection, contact a trusted robotic integrator, robotic GMAW gun manufacturer or welding distributor for assistance. Companies should also look for sturdy power cables that are able to withstand UV damage from the arc and resist wear, as well as those with quick-change features to further extend cable life, simplify changeover and prevent interruptions to the welding process. Using high-quality consumables — nozzles, contact tips and gas diffusers — is another way to improve the robotic welding operation and protect the robotic GMAW gun. For higher-amperage applications, companies may want to consider a chrome zirconium contact tip to withstand the higher heat levels. The connections between consumables should always be tight to prevent electrical resistance that could lead to failure and to gain good conductivity for a smooth and stable arc. When possible, adding a nozzle cleaning station or reamer to the robotic weld cell can further optimize the performance of the consumables and the robotic GMAW gun by ensuring that the nozzle is free of spatter and able to direct the shielding gas to the weld pool to protect the weld. It can also help minimize the risk of the consumables overheating. In certain instances, companies may reprogram the robot after a collision in order to re-establish tool center point (TCP) with a bent robotic GMAW gun neck. As an alternative, a neck checking fixture (or neck inspection fixture) can adjust the neck back to the correct TCP to help improve the performance of the gun and gain greater arc-on time. The neck checking fixture tests the neck profile to ensure that the contact tip will meet the TCP. If the tool point is off because of an impact or other problem, it readjusts the neck back to the correct position. This peripheral can also be used to inspect a new robotic GMAW gun neck prior to installation to ensure it is accurate. For companies that maintain a large number of robotic welding cells, a neck checking fixture can reduce downtime and costs when exchanging necks from one robotic GMAW gun to another — welding operators need only to remove the damaged or bent neck and replace it with a spare one that has been inspected already to get the robot back to welding immediately. The damaged neck can then be set aside for adjustments while the robot is already online. For newer robots with more sophisticated collision detection software, using a solid mount to protect the gun in the event of an impact can also help maintain a more accurate TCP than a clutch mount. Unlike a clutch mount that is designed to move, these durable, high-strength mounts offer greater repeatability for higher weld quality. They are also less expensive. To help maintain accuracy, quality and speed in the robotic welding operation, additions to the robotic GMAW gun like air blast and wire brake features are beneficial. An option for both air- and water-cooled robotic GMAW guns, the air blast feature forces high-pressure air through the front of the gun to help remove debris that could enter the weld pool and negatively affect weld quality. Welding operators can program the air blast feature to operate between weld cycles to reduce unnecessary downtime. Another option for robotic GMAW guns to help optimize welding performance is the addition of a wire brake feature. As its name implies, a wire brake prevents wire feeding when welding stops. The result is a consistent wire extension at the beginning of every weld, a factor that especially complements robots using touch-sensing software — the wire brake keeps the wire in position as the robot searches for the weld joint location. This optional robotic GMAW gun feature also keeps the wire from unspooling during arc starting and stops. Preventive maintenance (PM) is critical for gaining optimal performance from a robotic GMAW gun, whether it is air- or water-cooled or a conventional or through-arm style. Recommend PM activities include: The frequency of the PM schedule will depend on the size of the robotic welding operation and the application. Companies with large weldments on thick materials stand to have greater costs and downtime for rework should the gun fail and cause a quality issue. Maintaining the robotic GMAW gun more frequently is advised.
BEECHER, Ill./WINDSOR, Ontario. July 29, 2015 – Bernard and Tregaskiss have announced plans to attend FABTECH 2015 at McCormick Place in Chicago, November 9 to 12. To help companies improve productivity and quality, Bernard will showcase the latest in its semi-automatic MIG guns, fume extraction guns and consumables. Tregaskiss will feature its robotic MIG guns, peripherals and consumables. Both will share booth N14037 with Miller Electric Mfg. Co. and will feature select products on Miller power sources and robotic welding equipment for static and live demonstrations. Products to be on display from Bernard include: Tregaskiss will feature products at the show including:
WINDSOR, Ontario. July 16, 2015 — As a complement to the already reliable performance of the TOUGH GUN® TT3 reamer, Tregaskiss offers several accessories that are also designed to protect this peripheral. The TOUGH GUN reamer extends the life of robotic MIG guns and consumables by clearing the front end of spatter, helping to enhance productivity and improve weld quality in automated welding operations. Available accessories include: Lubricator: This dedicated motor lubricator is factory-set for optimal pneumatic oil lubrication and is ideal for damp environments. It can be ordered with a new TOUGH GUN TT3 reamer, which extends the Tregaskiss warranty from one year to three years, or retrofitted to an existing reamer. Filter / regulator: The filter cleans the air supply to the reamer, while also restricting debris from reaching the motor, resulting in less contamination and a longer reamer life. The regulator helps ensure the unit receives optimal air pressure. Spray containment unit: To improve air quality and help keep the weld cell cleaner, this unit captures anti-spatter overspray in its sealed basin, channeling it away from the unit to a convenient point of disposal, which can be shared among several Spray Containment units via an optional manifold. TOUGH GUN wire cutter: The wire cutter removes the ball-end of the welding wire to provide smooth arc starts and consistent wire stick-out, and can be used on a variety of wire types up to 1/16 inch in diameter. The wire cutter features a unique carbide cutter blade design with eight indexable cutting surfaces. Replacement cutter blades: These durable and accurate replacement cutting blades for the TOUGH GUN TT3 reamer feature a twin flute design for improved cutting and cleaning performance, all at a competitive price. They are made from harder, stronger material to increase resistance against breaking, snapping, chipping or cracking, and are designed to fit perfectly with TOUGH LOCK® consumables. Tregaskiss v-block: Compatible with Tregaskiss consumables and competitive brands, this four-sided v-block ensures that the cutter is concentric with the consumables and nozzle bore so that the reamer can effectively clear spatter. Tregaskiss offers five available v-block options when users configure a new TOUGH GUN TT3 reamer.
July 8, 2015 Tregaskiss is pleased to announce that the TOUGH GUN® TA3 robotic air-cooled MIG gun offering has been expanded to include configurations for FANUC® M710iC-12L and Kawasaki® BA006N robot models. Click here to learn more about the TOUGH GUN TA3 robotic air-cooled MIG gun.
Selecting equipment to provide the highest quality and productivity in a welding operation goes beyond just the power source or welding gun — consumables play an important role, as well. Contact tips, in particular, can make a significant difference between running an efficient process and accruing downtime to rectify problems. Selecting the right contact tip for the job can also impact the profitability of the welding operation. Contact tips are responsible for transferring the welding current to the wire as it passes through to create the arc. Optimally, the wire should feed through with minimal resistance, while still maintaining electrical contact. For that reason, it is always important to select a high-quality contact tip. While these products may cost slightly more than lesser-grade products, there is long-term value to negate that upfront purchase price. Furthermore, higher-quality contact tips are typically machined to tighter mechanical tolerances, creating a better thermal and electrical connection. They may also feature a smoother center bore, resulting in less friction as the wire feeds through. That means consistent wire feeding with less drag, which eliminates potential quality issues. Higher-quality contact tips can also help minimize burnbacks (the formation of a weld inside the contact tip) and help prevent an erratic arc caused by inconsistent electrical conductivity. They also tend to last longer. Contact tips used for semi-automatic MIG welding are typically composed of copper. This material provides good thermal and electrical conductivity to allow consistent current transfer to the wire, while also being durable enough to withstand the heat generated during the welding process. For robotic welding, some companies choose to use heavier-duty chrome zirconium contact tips, as these are harder than copper ones and better withstand the increased arc-on time of an automated application. In most cases, using a contact tip that matches the size of the wire leads to the best results. However, when wire is fed from a drum (e.g. those 500 pounds and larger) and/or when using solid wire, an undersized contact tip may improve welding performance. Because wire from a drum tends to have less cast, it feeds through the contact tip with less or no contact — having a smaller bore exerts more pressure on the wire, creating greater electric conductivity. Undersizing a contact tip, however, can increase friction, resulting in erratic wire feeding and, potentially, burnback. Conversely, using an oversized tip can decrease current transfer and increase tip temperatures, which can also lead to wire burnback. When in doubt about selecting the proper size contact tip, consult a trusted consumable manufacturer or welding distributor. As a best practice, always check the connection between the contact tip and the gas diffuser to be certain it is secure. Accordingly, a secure connection reduces electrical resistance that could lead to overheating. Contact tip recess refers to the position of the contact tip within the nozzle and is an important factor influencing weld quality, productivity and costs in a welding operation. Specifically, correct contact tip recess can reduce the opportunity for excessive spatter, porosity and burnthrough or warping on thinner materials. It can also help minimize radiant heat that could cause premature contact tip failure. Contact tip recess directly impacts wire stickout, also called electrode extension. The greater the recess, the longer the stickout is and the higher the voltage. Consequently, this makes the arc slightly less stable. For that reason, the best wire stickout is generally the shortest one allowable for the application; it provides a more stable arc and better low-voltage penetration. Typical contact tip positions are 1/4-inch recess, 1/8-inch recess, flush and 1/8-inch extension. Refer to Figure 1 for recommended applications for each. Contact tip failure can result from a number of influences, including burnbacks, mechanical and electrical wear, poor welding operator technique (e.g., variations in gun angle and contact-tip-to-work-distance [CTWD]), and reflective heat from the base material, which is common in tighter access weld joints or confined areas. The quality of the wire being used can also affect contact tip life. Poor quality wire often has an undesirable cast or helix that can cause it to feed erratically. That can prevent the wire and contact tip from connecting properly through the bore, consequently resulting in low conductivity and high electrical resistance. These issues can lead to premature contact tip failure due to overheating, as well as poor arc quality. To extend contact tip life, consider the following: In some instances, it may be desirable to convert to a water-cooled MIG gun to help keep the front-end consumables, including the contact tip, cooler and running for longer. Companies should also consider tracking their contact tip usage, noting excessive changeover and addressing accordingly with some of the suggested precautions. Addressing this downtime sooner than later can go far in helping companies reduce unnecessary costs for inventory, while also improving quality and productivity.
January 16, 2015 Tregaskiss has improved the crimp on our heavy duty (HD) nozzle offering. The profile on the crimping dies that form the ring crimp has been narrowed from a pad length of 0.450″ to a pad length of 0.390″ (see image below). This change significantly improves the quality of the crimp since it allows for enhanced integrity of the nozzle insulator. Click here to download the TOUGH LOCK® consumables spec sheet in PDF format for more detailed nozzle information.
Effective April 30, 2015 Miller Electric Mfg. Co. discontinued the Roughneck® C-Series MIG gun series and replaced them with Bernard® BTB semi-automatic air-cooled MIG guns. Miller Electric will continue to offer consumables and replacement parts for the Roughneck C-Series MIG guns. Please see the cross reference chart below to find the replacement Bernard BTB MIG gun part numbers for the Roughneck C-Series MIG guns: Q3010TE5EMC 12 ft (3.7 m) C-3015 Q3015TE5EMC Q4010TE5EMC C-4012 Q4012TE5EMC 194756 194757 S5010GH5IMC 10 ft (3 m) 194758 C-5012 S5015GH5IMC Certain products are only available for purchase from Miller Electric while others are available from either Miller Electric or Bernard. Please see the reference chart below which indicates where you can place an order for the guns, parts and consumables: PRODUCT WHERE TO BUY FasTip™ Consumables Miller Electric Mfg. Co. Quik Tip™ Consumables Miller Electric Mfg. Co. or Bernard Roughneck® Replacement Parts Miller Electric Mfg. Co. Bernard BTB MIG Guns Miller Electric Mfg. Co. or Bernard Bernard BTB MIG Gun Replacement Parts Miller Electric Mfg. Co. or Bernard To place an order through Miller Customer Service: please contact us via phone: 866-931-9730, fax: 800-637-2315 or email orders@millerwelds.com To place an order through Bernard Customer Service: please contact us via phone: 1-855-MIGWELD (644-9353), fax: 888-946-67-26 or email cs@itwmig.com If you are unable to find the answer you are seeking in the following FAQs, please contact the Miller and Bernard Customer Service Teams. 1. Q: Can I use Miller FasTip™ Consumables on the replacement Bernard BTB MIG Guns? A: Although we recommend the use of Bernard Quik Tip™ Consumables, users can install the FasTip diffuser on Bernard Best of the Best BTB MIG Guns and use FasTip Consumables (contact tips, nozzles). Users will need to order a neck insulator part # 4523R for use on Bernard BTB MIG Guns when using FasTip Consumables. Please use the FasTip consumable chart below as a reference: Contact Tip* M206188 M206190 Diffuser M206195 Nozzle M198855 M199618 Insulator 4523R * Based on wire size range 0.045″ – 1/16″ 2. Q: Can I use Miller Roughneck Liners on Bernard BTB MIG Guns? A: No, Users will need to order Bernard Universal Conventional Liners for Bernard BTB MIG Guns. Miller Roughneck Liners are not compatible on Bernard BTB MIG Guns. 3. Q: Can I use Bernard™ Quik Tip™ Consumables on existing Roughneck MIG Guns? A: Yes, the Quik Tip Consumable Series (contact tip, diffuser, nozzle) can be installed on Miller Roughneck MIG Guns. Users will need to order neck insulator part # 10012 to use on their Roughneck MIG Gun when using Bernard Quik Tip Consumables. Please use the consumable chart below as a reference: Contact Tip* T1045 T1116 Diffuser D118Q D114Q Nozzle N1C58Q N1C34HQ Insulator 10012 *Based on wire size range 0.045″ – 1/16″ 4. Q: Can I use Bernard Universal Conventional Liners on existing Roughneck MIG Guns? A: No, Users will still need to order Miller Roughneck Liners for existing Roughneck MIG Guns. Bernard Universal Conventional Liners are not compatible with existing Roughneck MIG Guns. 5. Q: Why does my Miller FasTip diffuser not thread on correctly to a Bernard BTB MIG Gun? A: A change to the thread on the FasTip diffuser was made on February 13, 2015 to be compatible with Bernard BTB MIG Guns. The new style diffuser has a large Miller logo roll mark compared to the old style diffuser that has a small Miller logo rollmark. To differentiate between the old and new style diffusers please see the comparison images below: 6. Q: How does a Miller Roughneck Gun compare to a Bernard BTB MIG Gun? A: Please see full gun comparison images below of the Roughneck C-Series MIG Gun (bottom) and Bernard BTB MIG Gun (top):
June 23, 2015 This innovative spray containment unit from Tregaskiss helps prevent air contamination by catching anti-spatter overspray in its sealed basin, improving the air quality of the working environment and maintaining the cleanliness of the weld cell. Not sure what type of nozzle you have? Download the Tregaskiss nozzles spec sheet in PDF format. Click here to learn more about the spray containment unit.
WINDSOR, Ontario. June 9, 2015 — Tregaskiss has announced the availability of its new Automation Catalog. Featuring the most up-to-date information on the company’s robotic MIG guns, consumables and peripherals, the catalog has a fresh new look and easy-to-read format. The 22-page, full-color Automation Catalog includes information about the new TOUGH GUN® CA3 and TOUGH GUN TA3 robotic air-cooled MIG guns, including convenient configurator spreads. These pages reflect the online configurators offered by Tregaskiss, which allow users to customize a robotic MIG gun for their exact needs based on amperage, neck and cable styles, power pin, gun mount and more. The catalog also features a new foldout consumables reference chart that provides technical and compatibility information for popular nozzles, retaining heads and contact tips, along with details about TOUGH LOCK® consumables and other Tregaskiss consumable brands. Other new additions to the Automation Catalog include information on:
For some fabricators, the choice between an air-cooled or a water-cooled robotic MIG welding gun is simple. Some heavy-duty applications simply demand a water-cooled model due to the high amperage and duty cycle requirements of the job — performance requirements that would cause an air-cooled gun to quickly overheat and fail. However, there are other less conventional robotic welding applications that may benefit from using a water-cooled MIG gun, too, and can contribute to much lower consumable costs and greater productivity. Water-cooled MIG guns typically have higher duty cycles and amperages, meaning they can be run for longer periods of time without stopping. Cooler guns mean cooler front-end consumables. In particular, it is possible to greatly extend contact tip life with these guns compared to air-cooled models. Deciding which system is the best choice involves careful analysis of several factors. In addition to amperage requirements and duty cycle, a fabricator should consider the up-front costs, potential return on investment (ROI) and the application specifics. Some fabricators may choose water-cooled robotic MIG guns based on the length of welds — the long arc-on time needed to produce these welds generates more heat in the gun. Similarly, critical start and stop points along a longer weld joint typically require a gun that can handle the extended amount of welding. Considering the weld joint design and the material type and thickness, as well as joint access can also factor into whether to choose a water-cooled MIG gun. For example, aluminum or heavy plate sections that have been pre-heated can generate substantial radiant heat that affects the cooling of the gun and can adversely affect the life of the front-end consumables. A water-cooled gun can help here. Some water-cooled robotic MIG guns have smaller diameter necks than air-cooled model due to optimized cooling capacity that requires less copper in the neck. As a result, they can reach into tighter spaces, through complex tooling restraints or into parts with access holes. When deciding whether a water-cooled robotic MIG gun is the best choice, it’s important to keep in mind that these products require more maintenance and often have a higher up-front cost. It is necessary to weigh those factors against the productivity gains and savings that can result from longer consumable life. Keeping MIG welding equipment cool is necessary to protect the power cable, gun body, neck and consumables from damage due to the radiant heat from the arc and the resistive heat from the electrical components in the welding circuit. A traditional water-cooled robotic MIG gun circulates a coolant from a radiator unit through cooling hoses inside the power cable and into the gun body and neck. The coolant returns to the radiator where the radiator’s baffling system releases the heat absorbed by the coolant. There are guns available on the market today, however, that cool only the front of the gun where heat is generated and still use an air-cooled cable. These features help save costs and eliminate potential leaks from the cable bundle where excess movements from whipping and repetitive motion create the greatest wear. These features contrast to a completely air-cooled MIG welding system, which relies solely on the ambient air and shielding gas to dissipate heat that builds up along the length of the welding circuit. Air-cooled systems use much thicker copper cables, and inner neck tubes; water-cooled robotic MIG guns use much less copper in the power cables and thinner wall sections in the necks because the cooling solution carries away the resistive heat before it builds up. In general, water-cooled robotic MIG guns are beneficial for high-amperage applications and are typically available in 300 to 600 amp models. Closely related to amperage is duty cycle, which refers to the amount of time during a 10-minute cycle that the gun can operate at its rated capacity without overheating. Water-cooled robotic MIG guns can have varying duty cycle capacity depending on the manufacturer and model. The amperage requirements, the length of time the arc is actually operating, and how the system will deal with the heat of welding in a specific application are among the most important considerations when choosing a water-cooled robotic MIG gun. When choosing a water-cooled robotic MIG gun, be sure to select a product and consumables that use high quality materials that can handle high heat. Guns on the market come in two styles: conventional and through-arm versions.Through-arm robotic MIG guns carry the cable assembly through the arm of the robot. This style can offer greater protection since the arm of the robot shields the power cable from abrasive wear and minimizes cable whipping during air moves. It’s important to know if the robotic arm is a conventional or through-arm style, so the gun and associated mounting bracket can be chosen to match. Knowing the robot model is also important for proper mounting hardware and insulating of the gun from the robot wrist. As with air-cooled applications, make sure during installation that the selected water-cooled robotic MIG gun allows proper joint access. Having a neck design with the proper geometry that accesses the joint with the appropriate travel and work angles can prevent poor weld quality and/or the need to re-tool expensive fixtures, which could add downtime. To make sure the cable bundle is the correct length, it’s also critical to know where the wire feeder will be located on the robot. If a cable bundle is too short, it might stretch; if it’s too long, it could interfere with opposing structures and also fail prematurely due to excess flexing. Some water-cooled robotic MIG guns on the market have features that make them especially easy to use and to integrate into the robotic welding system. One available feature is the quarter-turn connection, which helps establish a quick and tight connection to help maintain good conductivity and prevent shielding gas leaks. Models with the quarter-turn connection feature are designed to seat the connection properly once a quarter turn is made, making it much easier and faster to change the neck. Water-cooled robotic MIG guns with this quarter-turn connection feature also offer an automatic shutoff valve, to shut off the water flow any time the neck is changed, which helps simplify routine maintenance. Consider adding a flow switch to a system with water-cooled robotic MIG gun. These switches ensure water is flowing through the system; if the system doesn’t detect the flow of water in the gun, it will shut down and give an error message. Operating a gun without water flow will very quickly cause a catastrophic failure. All of this means added downtime and costly repairs. Water-cooled robotic MIG guns do require more maintenance than air-cooled models, since the presence of the water circuit introduces more potential issues. For example, if a hose or the neck is leaking, coolant could drip into the molten weld pool, leading to porosity and costly rework. It’s a good idea to conduct preventive maintenance each day or before the start of each shift. Just as with any welding system, it’s important to inspect a water-cooled robotic MIG gun to ensure that all consumables and connections are tight and working properly. Inspect the water lines frequently to make sure they are tight and have no leaks, and replace the O-rings when necessary (e.g., when cracks or wear appears). Using an automatic reamer or nozzle cleaning station adds significant benefits to the preventive maintenance of water-cooled robotic MIG guns. A reamer eliminates the need to manually clean out the front-end consumables and can, with the addition of an automated sprayer, add anti-spatter compound to help extend consumable life further. This feature adds to the overall cost of the equipment, but helps increase uptime for production, with less manual intervention, and offers a solid return on investment in most robotic welding operations. Do not fall prey to the notion that it is cheaper to use tap water in a water-cooled gun, as it can cause algae growth or mineral build-up and eventually clogging. Instead, use deionized water or the specially treated coolant solution recommended by the manufacturer. These coolants contain special additives to lubricate internal pumps and O-rings, as well as to prevent algae growth. Choosing a water-cooled robotic MIG gun is often a necessity because of the demands of the application. A water-cooled model requires more up-front investment and more maintenance, but it can provide significantly longer consumable life and increased productivity from fewer consumable changeovers. Consider the various costs, specific application needs and accessibility to decide if a water-cooled robotic MIG gun offers a good option for a specific robotic application. Often a welding distributor, welding equipment manufacturer or robotic welding system integrator can help. WINDSOR, Ontario. May 4, 2015 — A Tregaskiss-sponsored robotics team from Vincent Massey Secondary School of Windsor, Ontario, Canada, attended the FIRST Robotics World Championship in St. Louis on April 22 — a first-time appearance for the students at a world-level competition. The team, which consisted of 40 students in grades 9 to 12, competed against the world’s best robotics teams, placing 44th out of 77 in their division (there were 600 teams total), and gaining valuable experience to take into competitions in 2016. Over 40,000 spectators attended the event. “The trip was such a positive experience for the students and the teachers/mentors, and we appreciate all the support we received along the way,” said Sandra Chappus, robotics team mentor. “The students and the robot performed at their personal bests, so everyone is quite pleased. We’re already looking to learn new technologies to take into competition next year.” Among those new technologies is pneumatics, a feature that a top-ranked team at the competition sought the Vincent Massey teams help with during the competition. Currently, the team is focused on mechanical, electrical, business/media and programming facets. According to Tregaskiss Director of Operations Darren Grey, the company plans to continue its sponsorship of Windsor-area robotics teams in the future, and many employees have expressed an interest in mentoring students as they prepare their robots for competition next year. “We consider programs like these to be an important investment in the students’ futures,” Grey said. “Tregaskiss is a natural fit to support automation technology and we are proud to be able to help.”
WINDSOR, Ontario. April 16, 2015 — Tregaskiss recently partnered with Vincent Massey Secondary School of Windsor, Ontario, Canada to sponsor their robotics team for the Windsor-Essex Great Lakes Regional FIRST Robotics tournament on April 2-3. The event featured 48 teams totaling more than 1,000 students. The Vincent Massey Robotics Team qualified for the finals, advancing the 40 students on the team (grades 9 to 12) to the FIRST Robotics World Championship in St. Louis on April 22, where Tregaskiss will also offer its sponsorship support. “Our students are thrilled to have a chance to compete at such a high level after only the second year as a team,” says Sandra Chappus, mentor for the Vincent Massey Robotics Team. “The students’ talent is definitely matched by their enthusiasm and they have exceeded their own expectations going into the FIRST event. We are thankful to all of our sponsors, including Tregaskiss, for their help. Without that support, the students wouldn’t have such great opportunities.” “The FIRST Robotics competition allows students to immerse themselves in an initiative that mirrors industry in the real world,” adds Darren Grey, director of operations at Tregaskiss. “Within a short timeframe and with a limited budget, they are tasked with designing and manufacturing a working robot to compete against teams from across the US and Canada. We consider our sponsorship an important investment in these students’ futures — they are aspiring to be the engineers, technologists and scientists of tomorrow.” The Windsor-Essex Great Lakes Regional FIRST Robotics tournament consisted of robots competing to stack totes and recycling bins and maneuver pool noodles. Students spent six weeks building their robot and coding it for the task. The team is broken into four divisions — mechanical, electrical, business/media and programming — allowing students to focus their strengths on executing the task.
Manufacturing and fabrication environments are dynamic, ever changing with the economy, customer demands, available labor and skill sets, and competitive forces, among other factors. To maintain a favorable position in the industry, it is critical for companies to continually look for ways to increase efficiencies while also improving quality and decreasing costs. For many, that means a shift toward welding automation, which has experienced its own changes in the last 10 years. During this time, robotic welding manufacturers have transitioned away from the manufacture of conventional robotic welding systems to the development of through-arm styles, in which the power cable of the robotic MIG gun runs through the arm of the robot as opposed to over top of it. These are now the prevalent robot styles in the industry and this change has had a direct impact on the design of the robotic MIG guns for the marketplace. But it is not the only trend associated with robotic MIG guns. Like any component of the welding operation, this equipment has continued to evolve to the demands of the industry and to provide solutions to improve the business of welding. Improving and simplifying cable management has been the driving force behind the shift toward through-arm robots and, therefore, the development of through-arm robotic MIG guns to accompany them. With conventional style robots and guns, the cable is prone to “whipping” during air movements, which causes undue stress on this portion of the gun, and can lead to premature wear and failure caused by the cable rubbing against the robot or tooling. It also creates additional cost and time for companies to implement cable management systems. The through-arm style robot and through-arm robotic MIG gun make it easier for companies to minimize downtime associated with cable management and reduce costs for cable replacement. It also eliminates the risk of selecting the wrong cable length, a common mistake that occurs with conventional robotic MIG guns. The through-arm robot model dictates the length of the robotic MIG gun cable, so there is no concern about it being too long (which requires extra cable management or could cause wire feeding issues) or being too short (which can cause the cable to stretch and fail prematurely) — both issues associated with conventional robotic MIG guns. There are other benefits to the shift to through-arm robots and through-arm robotic MIG guns, namely that they can accommodate for increases in welding speed that are also becoming customary in the industry. Robots are getting much faster, but with the through-arm robot there is no longer the concern of the robotic MIG gun cable getting caught on tooling during quick movements. Too, it is easier to complete offline robot programming or welding simulation and have it work with these robots because there is less concern about having to accommodate for clearance for the power cable in an application. If a robotic MIG gun fitted for a through-arm robot works in simulation, it will most likely work in the real-world application. As companies strive for greater arc-on time and higher productivity, robotic MIG gun manufacturers are helping by providing increasingly more durable power cables on this equipment and implementing features that simplify cable changeover. Some manufacturers offer a rotating power connection on the front of the cable that allows the robot to spin on its final axis as much as necessary without binding the cable. This feature helps minimize stress due to routine torsion and to extend the life of this part of the gun, as well as to increase the robot’s operating range by allowing it to rotate a full 720 degrees (360 degrees in both directions) and weld faster. Built-in quick-change features on many robotic MIG guns also expedite cable replacement, adding to the operation’s productivity, while the use of stronger cable materials help better resist wear and UV damage from the arc for longer component life. Another trend associated with robotic MIG guns is the use of solid mounts (also called solid arm mounts) as opposed to the clutch mounts that were used previously to protect the gun in the event of a collision — an occurrence commonly caused by an incorrectly position work piece or tooling that has been left out of position, among other factors. This trend is due to more sophisticated collision detection software being built into today’s robots. This software is increasingly capable of monitoring current rates and/or torque so it can quickly stop the robot when an impact occurs. Solid mounts are made from durable, high-strength aluminum alloys, and are an alternative to the clutches used with older robot models. There are two key benefits to using a solid mount for robotic MIG guns compared to a clutch: Clutches (also called shock sensors) are designed to recognize the physical impact of the robotic MIG gun on a solid surface during a collision and send an electrical signal back to the robot controller, causing the system to stop. While effective, clutches are designed to move, which can affect tool center point (TCP) after a collision. Also, since it is an electrical device, it costs more than a solid mount and is more prone to failure because of its internal components — expenses that many companies can now happily omit. As companies seek ways to become more competitive and produce higher volumes of parts, they need to maximize floor space to make room for more robots to do the job. As a result, robots and welding cells are becoming smaller and in many instances, tooling has become more complex. These changes pose greater space constraints when it comes to the robotic MIG gun. Many robotic MIG gun manufacturers have responded to this trend by creating guns that provide a more open work envelope around the mounting arm (the depth from the wrist of the robot to the tip of the robotic MIG gun) so maneuvering around tooling and gaining joint access becomes less cumbersome. There are also more options for neck lengths and angles available for robotic MIG guns, which helps companies gain access to complicated joints. Because many robotic welding applications tend toward higher amperages and longer arc-on times, it is critical for companies to have a robotic MIG gun that provides adequate amperage without overheating. The complexity and increased cost of water-cooled robotic MIG gun systems (compared to air-cooled models), however, make some companies wary of the investment for their high amperage applications. Too, if there is an issue with the coolant flow, there is the risk of the robotic MIG gun overheating and failing — an event that can be costly not just for replacement of the gun, but also potentially for rework of the part should quality problems occur. A development in recent years that addresses this concern is a hybrid robotic MIG gun. This type of gun has a durable neck like an air-cooled model and water lines that run external to the neck down to the nozzle. Should the coolant flow fail, the gun can rely on the underlying air-cooled unicable to provide enough current-carrying capacity for the job for a period of time, saving downtime and costs to address a complete robotic MIG gun failure. These guns also offer the higher amperage associated with a standard water-cooled gun, making them a good option for companies who need greater cooling capacity for an application. Because time is at a premium when it comes to robotic welding, companies are always looking for ways to extend their robotic welding cycle time — down to the second. To help maintain greater arc-on time while still protecting the robotic MIG gun and consumables from spatter build-up that could affect weld quality, adding air blast to robotic MIG guns is becoming a popular choice with some companies. This optional feature can be added to the robotic MIG gun and functions by blowing compressed air through the gun at a high pressure (approximately 100 pounds per square inch — psi) to clear debris loose in the front end while the robot is moving out of the way so the table/fixture can index. This addition can help companies reduce the number of times that the robotic MIG gun needs to be reamed out by a reamer or nozzle cleaning station, resulting in more arc-on time and greater productivity. While robotic MIG guns may seem like a small part of the whole automated system, their design and functionality can have a significant impact on the cost, productivity and quality of an application. The trends discussed here are just some of the ways that robotic MIG gun manufacturers have adjusted the designs and capacity of the products to help companies gain the best results in recent years. As with any piece of welding equipment, robotic MIG guns will need to continue evolving just like any equipment in order to meet companies’ changing needs and to meet the demands of the fabrication and manufacturing industry.
Consider some of the top things to know about robotic MIG guns as a way to get the most out of this equipment. When it comes to robotic welding, precision, repeatability and speed are essential to ensuring a successful outcome in the operation. In order to gain the best benefits, companies rely on the robot’s ability to execute the same weld, exactly the same way and as fast as possible. And while the robot itself, proper programming and oversight by a trained welding supervisor are all important components in the robotic welding operation, the robotic MIG gun also has a direct impact on quality and productivity, as well as costs.
Equipment repairs are a fact of life on most jobsites, so finding ways to reduce costs and downtime while making them is important for overall efficiency and productivity — and the bottom line. The welding operation on a jobsite, just like any other portion of the business, offers opportunities to conserve resources and extend equipment life. Proper selection, handling and use of welding consumables and accessories can be helpful when it comes to getting the most out of a MIG gun, as can proper gun maintenance. Jobsites are often exposed to many environmental challenges, including extreme hot and cold temperatures, and the presence of rain and mud. It’s important to keep nozzles, gas diffusers and contact tips in the original packaging to protect against these elements until they are ready for use. Doing so also prevents scratches and/or dents from forming where spatter can accumulate and cause the consumables to fail prematurely. In addition, it prevents dirt, oil or other debris from adhering to the consumables and inadvertently entering the weld puddle, which can lead to poor weld quality. Remember, proper storage and handling doesn’t just lower actual costs for consumables by extending consumable life, it can also prevent weld defects that require costly and time-consuming rework. Choose the most appropriate neck for a MIG welding application in order to increase comfort and control, and save money. Rotatable necks, for example, can be adjusted without tools, so neck angles can be quickly changed during a welding repair once the desired position is determined. This feature is important on a jobsite where welding may be done in various positions or in tight spaces, and it helps reduce downtime for changing over MIG guns or for purchasing and inventorying extras. Rotatable necks are especially useful for welding on different angles. For hard-to-reach areas, consider a neck coupler, which allows for two existing necks to connect to extend their reach — again without the cost of purchasing a new or specialized neck. Flex necks are another good option for saving money and gaining greater comfort and control, particularly for applications with tighter joints. The operator can bend the neck to multiple angles to work around corners or get into small spaces for greater flexibility during repairs, without the expense of stocking different neck angles. Regularly perform a visual inspection of the nozzle — inside and outside — to look for spatter build-up. If there is accumulation, either clean the nozzle with a tool designed specifically for the job or replace the nozzle when necessary. During the inspection, also check that the nozzle, contact tip and retaining head are tightened properly, as these components can naturally loosen during welding. Inspecting and tightening consumables help ensure good shielding gas coverage, reliable electrical conductivity and consistent weld quality, as well as reduce costs for purchasing and replacing new consumables. It is also important to inspect the power cable on the MIG gun for any wear or damage, replacing it as necessary to avoid potential problems. Always trim MIG gun liners according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, using the proper tools and cutting the liner to the correct length. Too long of a liner can cause kinking, while cutting it too short allows debris to build up between the liner and the gas diffuser. Either way, the wrong liner length can cause poor wire feeding and premature failure of both the liner and the contact tip, adding unnecessary costs. Use a liner gauge when possible to determine the proper length for the particular liner being used. Also be certain that there are no burrs or sharp edges after the liner is cut. Also, keep the liner away from contaminants (e.g., don’t let it drag on the ground) during installation. As further protection, the welding operator’s hands or gloves should be clean when handling the liner. These precautions protect against contaminants that could enter the weld puddle and cause costly weld quality issues or downtime for rework. Use the shortest length MIG gun cable possible for the welding application, as it minimizes the opportunity for kinking, as well as premature wear of both the cable and the MIG gun liner. A shorter cable also helps prevent wire-feeding problems that could lead to an erratic arc, poor weld quality and unnecessary downtime for rework or consumable replacement. It also tends to cost less, adding to savings for repair jobs. In addition, remember to choose the correct diameter liner and contact tip for the welding wire, as this prevents similar problems and helps extend the life of these consumables. While up-front cost is an important factor when choosing consumables, consider the long-term savings offered by purchasing sturdier and more expensive consumables. These consumables likely will last longer — especially in the face of the harsh conditions of some jobsites — reducing the downtime associated with changeover and the cost of more frequent replacement of the consumables themselves. As an additional defense against spatter accumulation, purchase nozzles that have a smooth, non-porous surface. Be sure to check that the nozzles are free of any sharp edges or flat spots that would further allow spatter to adhere. Whenever possible, purchase MIG guns and consumables that are backed by a reliable manufacturer’s warranty, and use all guns and consumables as intended so as not to void the terms and conditions. Keeping these simple tips in mind can help reduce the downtime spent on maintenance and MIG gun or consumable changeover, so welding operators can get back to welding faster, get equipment back into service sooner and save money.
When it comes to welding, no two applications are alike. Just as it’s important to select a power source that is right for the job, it is also essential to select a MIG gun that will deliver the appropriate amperage and cooling capabilities. There are four main MIG gun categories to consider when making the selection: light-duty, heavy-duty, air-cooled and water-cooled. Like any welding equipment, each has its advantages and disadvantages, as well as applications for which it is best suited. Depending on the amount of arc-on time required for an application and the amperage needed, a light- or heavy-duty MIG gun may be the best choice. The key is to make sure that the gun provides the necessary amperage to avoid overheating and premature failure. As a general rule, light-duty MIG guns work well for welding on thin materials, like sheet metal, for tacking or for other applications that require short arc-on times. These guns tend to be smaller and lighter than heavy-duty guns, making them more comfortable for the welding operator, and most MIG gun manufacturers offer them in models ranging from 100 to 300 amps. Light-duty MIG guns also tend to be less expensive than heavy-duty ones and use light- or standard-duty consumables (nozzles, contact tips and gas diffusers) that are also less expensive. There are some limitations to consider when using light-duty MIG guns, too. Despite the lower purchase price, these guns may need to be replaced more frequently due to the lighter-duty components. For example, the strain relief on light-duty guns is often made from a flexible rubber component or absent all together, which can sometimes lead to kinking and cause poor wire feeding and/or shielding gas flow. Also, some unicables on light-duty MIG guns have crimped connections and may not be able to be repaired, requiring replacement of the cable or possibly the entire gun. Heavy-duty MIG guns are typically the best option for applications requiring multiple passes on thick sections of material or for long durations of welding. They are available in the marketplace in both air- and water-cooled models (discussed below) ranging from 400 to 600 amps. The necks on these guns are often longer, which creates more distance between the welding operator and the high heat from the arc, and the handles on these guns are usually larger, too. While the handle size is vital to accommodate the larger cables necessary for higher amperage output, it can make the gun more cumbersome for the welding operator to maneuver. These guns frequently also use heavy-duty front-end consumables that are capable of withstanding high amperages and longer arc-on times, but they are more expensive. Choosing between a water- or air-cooled model for high-amperage, heavier-duty applications depends on several factors, including the amperage required, cost and operator preference. As with the considerations for a light-duty gun, applications that involve welding at lower amperages for less amount of time are best suited to air-cooled MIG guns. These guns rely on the ambient air and shielding gas to dissipate the heat that builds up along the length of the welding circuit. These systems, which range from 150 to 600 amps, use much thicker copper cabling than water-cooled systems so the guns are generally larger. Water-cooled MIG guns are best suited for applications that require long, continuous welds and are typically available in a range from 300 to 600 amps. These guns operate via a water-cooled MIG welding system that pumps cooling solution from a radiator unit, usually integrated inside or near the power source. This coolant passes through hoses inside the cable bundle and into the gun handle and neck. The coolant returns to the radiator where a baffling system releases the heat absorbed by the coolant. The ambient air and shielding gas further disperses the heat from the welding arc. Each MIG gun has its advantages and disadvantages. Water-cooled MIG guns are more expensive up-front and can require more maintenance and operational costs. However, water-cooled guns also are much smaller and lighter than air-cooled guns, so they can provide productivity advantages by reducing welding operator fatigue. Also, because water-cooled guns require more equipment, they can be impractical for applications that require portability. The goal when selecting between air- or water-cooled guns, as well as light- or heavy-duty models, is to weigh out pros and cons like these and always make the selection that will provide the capacity to prevent downtime and drive productivity. Premature contact tip failure is a common problem that can lead to unexpected downtime — and added costs — in a welding operation. This issue not only hinders productivity, it can also negatively affect weld quality and create rework. Contact tips play a critical part in achieving high quality welds. Because of the constant friction from the wire and the exposure to the heat of the arc (and, in some cases, the reflective heat from the base material), contact tips take a tremendous amount of abuse during welding. This can easily turn into premature contact tip failure without the proper precautions. Understanding the typical types of contact tip failures and their causes is the best approach to preventing them. There are two main types of contact tip failure. 1. Failure that leads to a burnback and its associated problems 2. Failure that produces contact tip wear Burnbacks occur when a weld forms within the contact tip and can occur at any point along the weld. They are not necessarily the result of poor contact tip performance, but rather burnbacks can result from too slow of wire feed speeds and/or incorrect contact-tip-to-work distance (also referred to as CTWD). The CTWD is the distance between the end of the contact tip and the base material; if the distance is too short (i.e. the contact tip is too close to the workpiece), a burnback can occur. The quality of the wire, incorrect parameter settings and micro-spatter buildup, as well as incorrect wire feeder and liner adjustments can all contribute to burnbacks. When they occur, burnbacks reveal themselves by way of poor arc starts, arc instability, inconsistent wire feeding and, ultimately, stoppages in wire feeding altogether. Contact tip wear can be both mechanical and electrical. It occurs from the friction of the wire feeding through the bore of the contact tip and is especially prevalent in higher amperage semi-automatic and robotic applications. In the latter, contact tip wear can produce issues with tool center point (TCP), resulting in offset welds and potentially rework, especially in robotic welding systems that do not employ seam tracking. The design of the contact tip and the material it is composed of are two factors that affect a contact tip’s tendency toward wear. Typically, manufacturers use copper for contact tips because it is readily available and offers good electrical and thermal conductivity. Copper, however, has a relatively low resistance to wear, making it more prone to failures. For higher amperage applications, companies often turn to chrome zirconium contact tips due to their strength and their ability to resist wear by heat. All contact tips, regardless of the material used to manufacture them, will eventually fail if used or abused for a long enough periods of time and/or at a high enough temperature. They are, after all, consumables with a finite lifespan. The goal, nonetheless, is to prolong the life of the consumables in order to avoid unnecessary downtime, as well as cost for additional inventory. A good step in achieving those goals is to understand the ways to help prevent contact tip failure. Burnbacks: There is no one solution to minimize contact tip failure due to burnbacks; each situation is unique and may require a series of corrective actions. The goal is to address the associated errors or issues that are leading to the burnback in the first place. The two key solutions for minimizing burnbacks include increasing the wire feed speed and/or lengthening the distance of the MIG gun from the workpiece. The nozzle should be no further than one-half inch from the base metal. Matching a welding wire with the appropriate cast for the contact tip bore tolerance can also reduce the risk for burnbacks, as it helps improve electrical contact and reduce CTWD variability. The wire’s cast is affected by three main factors: the supply reel (spool or drum); drive roll tension; and MIG gun neck angle. A tight wire cast may allow for a looser bore tolerances and still be able to make the appropriate electrical contact with the contact tip to create a stable arc. A straighter cast may require a contact tip with a tighter bore to exert pressure on the wire and create consistent conductivity. It is important to note that with a smaller contact tip bore, there is a risk of the spatter build up, so cleanliness is key. Selecting contact tips with a smooth surface and bore can also help prevent the wire from snagging on the consumable and causing a burnback. Using a contact tip/gas diffuser design that maximizes the surface area between these consumables is another option to reduce the potential for this problem — the tight connection creates less heat and can reduce micro-spatter that could hinder the wire from feeding and becoming blocked in the contact tip bore. Additional preventive measures include: • Adjusting the drive rolls to ensure smooth wire feeding Contact tip wear: The degree of wear on a contact tip depends on multiple factors, including operating temperatures; the wire cast; and the surface condition, material properties and bore tolerances of the contact tip. Lowering operating temperatures, when feasible, is among the best defenses against contact tip wear. These lower temperatures can be achieved in a number of ways, for example, using a water-cooled MIG gun. These types of guns are especially well suited for higher amperage applications (usually between 300- and 600-amps). They do, however, introduce some additional complexities to the welding operation that companies need to consider. Namely, water-cooled guns have a weaker neck than air-cooled models, so in robotic applications specifically, they can be more prone to bending in the event of a crash. They also tend to be more expensive to maintain. When deciding whether to use a water-cooled MIG gun to help combat the excessive heat that could lead to contact tip wear, users will have to weigh out the advantages and disadvantages of this equipment in terms of costs and productivity to determine if the product is the best choice. An alternative to reduce contact tip wear via lower temperatures would be to use a thermally-effective air-cooled torch in combination with front end consumables designed to dissipate heat. Typically, high quality consumables have been designed to seat firmly together to minimize electrical resistance, thereby generating less heat and reducing the opportunity for contact tip wear and failure. Remember that cheaper isn’t always better. When it comes to purchasing consumables, it may be worth the extra cost upfront for such a design in order to minimize long-term costs and downtime associated with contact tip changeover. In any welding operation, there is no single solution to instill efficiencies — it can be a matter of technique, equipment and more. However, minimizing contact tip failure is an important way to reduce downtime and costs, while also ensuring higher weld quality. Be sure to train new welding operators as to the value of taking preventive measures to combat burnbacks and contact tip wear, emphasizing the impact of these occurrences on the overall welding operation. As with any process, education can go a long way in helping companies create a more productive and profitable business.
Outdoor jobsites can be harsh environments for welding equipment, including guns and consumables. When it comes to MIG or flux-cored (FCAW) welding on the jobsite, selecting the right gun for the application, and following some basic maintenance and preparation tips can help make guns and consumables last longer — factors that can help reduce costs, increase productivity and improve weld quality. Keeping this equipment up and running also helps minimize unscheduled downtime, which is key to meeting contract deadlines and keeping the business moving. This article discusses tips for protecting and maintaining MIG guns and consumables on the jobsite. Welding guns often take a lot of abuse on jobsites and in job shops, so it’s important to look for a durable gun that meets the demands of a specific application. Variables to keep in mind when selecting the gun include the material type and thickness to be welded, and how much welding will be required (if welding makes up one hour versus seven hours of each workday, for example). Additional challenges on outdoor jobsites are the weather and wind, which can blow the shielding gas away from the weld puddle, causing porosity in the completed weld. For this reason, a popular option for many outside contractors is a flux-cored welding gun, which can be used with self-shielded wire that generates its own shielding gas to reduce problems caused by wind. Whether using a MIG gun or a flux-cored gun, it’s important to select a gun with a rigid strain relief. A good strain relief (which refers to the connection between the power cable and power pin) helps minimize kinking, which can lead to poor wire feeding, an unstable arc and poor weld quality. • The gun should have enough amperage to meet the needs of the application. To determine the necessary amperage, consider the material type and thickness and wire size being used. • The power cable must have enough copper content to handle the amperage that will be put through it. When possible, use shorter power cables on the MIG gun to minimize costs and downtime further. As a general rule, shorter power cables are less expensive and offer better maneuverability. Shorter power cables also can help minimize wire-feeding problems associated with kinking and coiling. • The handle of the gun often is what takes the most abuse, so make sure to select a handle durable enough for the application, as some handles are designed for more light-duty applications. Choosing a handle that is comfortable for the welding operator also is important, so consider using the smallest handle that can still meet amperage needs to help minimize fatigue. • MIG gun triggers come in various styles and designs, such as standard, locking and dual schedule, and selecting the trigger often comes down to operator preference. Select a trigger that’s comfortable to use and easy to access for servicing. Some applications may be well suited for a dual-pull trigger, which allows the operator to easily switch between settings without stopping and walking back to the power source to make changes. Reducing those trips to the power source also helps improve safety by eliminating the need to navigate through cluttered jobsites and with it the potential for slips or falls. Regularly inspecting the MIG gun can be an important part of reducing costs and ensuring good welding performance, impacting productivity and efficiency. Preventive maintenance for MIG guns and flux-cored guns doesn’t have to be time-consuming or difficult. Often, the fundamental principles are the same, whether the welding is being done on a jobsite outside or in a shop. Here are some key tips for maintaining a welding gun on the jobsite: • Make sure all connections are tight. Inspect the connections between the contact tip, gas diffuser, nozzle and power pin. The wire feeder connection (where the power pin plugs into the feeder) must be tightened properly and should be free of dirt and debris. Loose or dirty wire feeder connections can cause heat to build up, leading to voltage drops that adversely affect the welding arc and may cause premature gun failure. Tighten the connection according to the manufacturer’s specification or replace the direct plug if necessary to obtain a secure fit. • Properly care for the gun liner. Make sure to install only a clean gun liner. Dragging a liner through the dirt while installing it can allow dirt and debris to accumulate on it, causing wire feeding issues. Having the proper cut length on the liner is also extremely important to help prevent birdnesting. It’s not uncommon during the course of welding for the gun liner to become clogged with debris. This accumulation of debris can, over time, lead to poor wire feeding, bird-nesting and burnbacks that require downtime to fix. Spraying compressed air through the liner can help clear out potential blockages. • Visually inspect the power cable. Look for any damage such as nicks or cuts in the power cable, which can affect wire feeding or conductivity. Power cable maintenance is an important part of eliminating unnecessary equipment costs and improving jobsite safety. Cuts in the cable can expose copper wire and lead to a potential shock hazard, while kinking obstructs gas flow and wire feeding, which can result in weld defects and arc instability. • Inspect the handle and trigger. Typically these components require little maintenance beyond visual inspection, but be sure to regularly look for cracks on the handle or missing screws. Check that the gun trigger is not sticking or otherwise malfunctioning, and replace these components as necessary. • Check the gun neck. Loose connections at either end of the neck can cause electrical resistance that leads to poor weld quality and/or consumable failures. Also, visually inspect the insulators on the neck and replace them if damaged. These insulators prevent electrically live components from exposure, ensuring operator safety and longevity of equipment. • Be mindful of consumables. Frequently inspect the nozzle and contact tip for spatter build-up, which can obstruct shielding gas flow and cause weld defects that will need to be reworked, costing time and money. Spatter build-up also can cause consumables to fail prematurely. Replace the nozzle and contact tip when necessary. • Store the gun and consumables properly. Welding equipment performs best when it’s properly stored, such as in a box or cabinet, and kept out of the elements. Liners can become corroded from exposure to the environment, which impacts the conductivity and performance of the gun. Regular and basic care and maintenance can help extend welding equipment life on a jobsite. Simple steps such as ensuring all connections are tight and in good working order and that the weld ground is good can help produce results every day. Inspection of the MIG or flux-cored gun, equipment and consumables every time the machine is started can keep things running smoothly and reduce unplanned downtime, which helps reduce costs, extend consumable life and improve welding performance.
December 31, 2014 The TOUGH GARD® spatter cleaner has been discontinued as of December 31, 2014. Replacement parts will continue to be available until December 31, 2015. Prices and availability of these replacement parts are subject to change without notice. Consider an upgrade to the TOUGH GUN® TT3 (analog) or TT3E (Ethernet) reamer robotic nozzle cleaning station from Tregaskiss. Click here to learn more. Click here to download the M075 TOUGH GARD spatter cleaner technical guide.
Estimated reading time: 11 minutes The cost to implement welding automation can be substantial, requiring companies to plan out the purchase carefully and to justify the expenditure to the appropriate financial or management personnel. The payback on the investment, however, can be equally beneficial. From productivity increases to quality improvements and cost savings, companies can often position themselves for greater competitiveness in the marketplace by adding robotic welding systems to their welding operation or by replacing manual welding cells altogether. Unlike companies that employ semi-automatic welding, those with robotic welding systems have the added responsibility of protecting the large capital investment in the equipment. But no two robotic welding systems are the same and likewise, there is no single step to ensure a successful outcome. Rather, a combination of the appropriate planning, equipment purchases and personnel training — among many other things — provides the best results. Paying close attention to the daily occurrences in a robotic welding cell and engaging regularly in some of the best practices discussed here can also help provide high quality results. Companies typically invest in welding automation to expedite the welding process, gain more consistent weld quality and/or to reduce costs. The process can also set companies apart from the competition by allowing for faster completion and delivery of products. For companies with high-volume demands and low-variation parts, robotic welding can become an important part of their production plans. Smaller companies with lower-volume, high-variety parts can also benefit, but they may require more flexible tooling and more programming time to accommodate for several types of products. The important consideration for both high- and low-volume production is to ensure that the parts to be welded lend themselves appropriately to an automated welding process. Robotic welding systems rely on consistent parts to provide consistent results. Companies that have or are planning to implement a robotic welding system need to be certain that parts are simple and repeatable. The presence of gaps, poor fit-up or poor joint access can have a detrimental impact on the high quality sought with robotic welding systems. Similar to a semi-automatic welding application, consistent workflow is also important for a successful robotic welding operation, with the main difference being the speed at which parts are delivered and welded since a robotic system is so much faster. The parts need to enter and leave the cell at a quicker and steadier rate — without bottlenecks — to gain optimal throughput. Companies should assess each activity leading up to the part entering the cell, making sure that the supply of parts matches the robot’s cycle time, and also assess the steps for handling the part after it leaves. In some cases, it may be necessary to change how the parts are fabricated upstream and completed downstream (e.g., finishing, painting, etc.) to establish good workflow. Companies should also look to eliminate non-value added activities, including excessive lifting or handling of parts, and avoid multiple trips to stack products or other similar activities. Robotic welding systems typically operate at higher amperages and longer duty cycles than semi-automatic welding operations — the robots can withstand the greater arc-on time and heat compared to a human operator. While those increases are excellent for supporting high productivity, the additional heat and welding duration can be especially harsh on consumables — nozzles, contact tips and gas diffusers (or retaining heads). Companies need to take steps to avoid the pitfall of excessive consumable changeover. Entering the weld cell for purposes other than part changeover or routine pauses in the operation can add unnecessarily to downtime, which can easily add up per shift, day, month and year, resulting in lost productivity. Excessive consumable changeover is also costly, as it increases inventory and inventory management. There are two key steps companies can take steps to increase consumable life in their robotic applications and reduce downtime. One, install consumables properly and maintain tight connections throughout the course of welding. Loose connections increase electrical resistance, causing the consumables to generate additional heat that can shorten their lifespan and/or cause them to perform poorly. Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for proper consumable installation, taking care to tighten the consumables appropriately. It’s also a good idea to check the consumables periodically during routine pauses in welding, as they can loosen throughout a shift. Two, install the robotic MIG gun liner properly, as this helps prevent downtime to address wire feeding issues or to correct a burnback, in which the wire “burns back” into the contact tip. Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for trimming and installation, using a liner gauge to confirm the correct liner length. Preventing premature power cable failure, which can occur in both through-arm robotic welding systems (where the cable feeds through the arm of the robot) or in standard robotic welding systems (also referred to as over-the-arm) is also important. Be mindful of the path the robot has been programmed to follow, the speed at which it moves and the cable length. The power cable should clear the robotic arm and tooling to prevent it from catching or rubbing against either part. Also, the robot should be programmed not to move too fast or abruptly. Aggressive movements can cause the power cable to snap. Make sure that the cable is the appropriate length — too short of a cable can stretch beyond its capacity during routine robotic movements, leading to greater wear. If the power cable is too long, it may be prone to kinking or becoming pinched by the robot’s arm. Preventive maintenance (PM) programs are among the most effective best practices a company can instill for a robotic welding system. Ideally, PM programs should cover every aspect of the system — from the robot to the contact tip. Proper PM activities can help prevent unscheduled downtime, low quality parts, costly repairs and/or equipment replacements. Companies will need to assess their PM needs on an individual basis and engage a maintenance team or other personnel to carry out the activities at the appropriate times and intervals. As a general rule, companies that weld thick materials or have applications with long, continuous welds common in welding automation can benefit from more frequent PM activities, as the rework for quality issues can generate much more costly rework compared to an application producing multiple smaller parts. Several PM activities can occur during routine pauses in production, including: • Cleaning the robot and fixturing to prevent the buildup of dirt, debris or anti-spatter compound, which could affect part fit-up. Other activities that happen less frequently like greasing the robots joints can be completed during a longer scheduled stop. Peripherals are often an overlooked part of the robotic welding system. The added cost of this equipment, which includes nozzle cleaning stations (also called reamers or spatter cleaners), is frequently considered an unnecessary expense. In reality, this equipment can maximize robotic welding performance and help companies gain a better return on investment (ROI) from their robotic welding system. As its name suggests, a nozzle cleaning station cleans the nozzle of dirt, debris and spatter, typically during routine pauses in the robotic welding operation. The goal of this cleaning action is to help ensure consistent shielding gas coverage, and with it, reduce weld defects, expensive rework and lost productivity. A nozzle cleaning station also helps extend the life of consumables, minimizing the downtime and expense for changeover. For the best results, the nozzle cleaning station should be mounted in close proximity to the robot to reduce the amount of time necessary for its arm to reach it. Companies can mount the peripheral overhead if need be. The robot should be programmed to clamp onto the nozzle cleaning station at a taught position exactly perpendicular to the cutting blade that clears out the spatter or other debris. Any misalignment to the position of the nozzle could lead to partial cleaning of the nozzle and excessive spatter build-up. Program the robot to go to the nozzle cleaning station as often as possible; the cleaner the consumables are, generally the better performing and longer lasting they will be. For companies who choose to attach an anti-spatter sprayer, it’s important to locate the spray in the appropriate position so it completely coats the inside of the nozzle. Ideally the outside should be covered to within three-quarters of an inch from the bottom of the nozzle. Other peripherals that companies can integrate into their robotic welding system include a wire cutter and a neck inspection tool (discussed in the next section). A wire cutter cuts the welding wire to a specified length, removing any inconsistencies at the end, providing for more reliable and smoother arc starts and better seam tracking for robots featuring that technology. For companies using touch sensing software, using a wire cutter in conjunction with a robotic MIG gun featuring a wire brake can help prevent problems with seam tracking. Touch sensing allows the robot to store position data and send electrical impulses back to the controller once it has located the joint. For applications that have slight variations in parts, touch sensing helps maintain weld consistency. It is also more cost-effective than investing in new tooling and fixturing to hold a part in a precise location; if the part moves slightly, the robot can still locate the joint and weld accurately, as long as the joint has well-defined edges. Using a wire cutter can ensure the wire is cut to a consistent length; the wire brake holds the wire in a set position as the robot articulates and searches for the weld joint, ensuring more accurate touch sensing readings for more consistent weld quality. For a robot to be repeatable and provide consistent welds, it is important for the system to maintain its tool center point or TCP, which is the focal point of the robotic MIG gun and its relationship with the position of the welding wire in the joint (gun-to-work distance). Typically, but not always, TCP issues occur after a collision, during which the neck of the robotic MIG gun becomes bent. To rectify the issue, welding operators can employ a peripheral called a neck inspection tool (or neck-checking tool) to bend the neck back to the proper angle. Most neck inspection tools are designed to accommodate standard necks for a particular brand of robotic gun. To use this peripheral, the welding operator or maintenance personnel needs to determine the tolerances for the robotic welding program and adjust the bent neck to meet the correct specifications. To maintain TCP, it is also important to install the robotic MIG gun neck properly, making sure it is fully seated. If not, it will extend too far and can cause TCP to be compromised. Programming the robot for a TCP check to verify proper position can also help prevent against quality issues and potential downtime. Another best practice to help ensure on-location welds is to check that fixturing is in the correct place, that it doesn’t allow the parts to move and that the base of the robot is securely in place. Periodically check that part variation hasn’t changed, as well. Designing parts for automation, managing workflow, selecting the right equipment and implementing a consistent PM program mean nothing if companies don’t have the right personnel in place to work with and/or oversee the robotic welding system. Investing in the people who are responsible for interacting with the robotic welding system should always be a priority. Skilled welding operators or employees with previous robotic welding experience are often a good choice for overseeing a robotic welding system. The personnel should undergo the proper up-front training before taking on the responsibility of working with the robotic welding system — loading and unloading parts and programming the robot for instance. Robotic welding integrators and robot manufacturers can often provide OEM-based training and continuing education. The goal is to instill the skills necessary not only to work with the robot on a daily basis, but also to be able to hone troubleshooting skills that can promote the maximum uptime in the robotic welding cell. These individuals can also be part of the PM programs mentioned earlier. As with any capital investment, companies need to take the appropriate steps to protect their robotic welding system. Whether it’s the addition of peripherals or implementing additional training, engaging in a few best practices can help companies gain a solid payback on the equipment, empower employees to be part of the company’s success and establish the robotic welding system as a profitable part of their business. The items discussed here are by no means exhaustive. Companies can seek out ideas for improving their operation from other, non-competitive companies, or work with a trusted welding distributor or robotic integrator for further options.
Liners are still available in lengths of up to 25 feet (7.6 m) for various wire sizes. Part numbers will remain the same as released on June 2, 2014. Please see the chart below for part numbers and wire sizes: 0.023″- 0.030″ Yellow L1A-15 L1A-25 0.030″- 0.035″ Green L2A-15 L2A-25 0.035″- 0.045″ White L3A-15* L3A-25* 0.045″- 1/16″ Red L4A-15** L4A-25** 5/64″ Blue L6A-15 L6A-25 3/32″ Grey L7A-15 L7A-25 7/64″ – 1/8″ Black L8A-15 L8A-25 *Standard Liner for 0.035″-0.045″ Guns
Selecting the Right Size Contact Tip
Selecting the Right Size Contact Tip
This article has been published as a web-exclusive on thefabricator.com. To read the entire story please click here.
Trends in semi-automatic MIG guns to consider
Trends in semi-automatic MIG guns to consider
Building in features
Reducing fume
Configuring a MIG gun
Other trends
Optimizing the Robotic Welding Process with the Right GMAW Gun
Optimizing the Robotic Welding Process with the Right GMAW Gun
Making the right choice
Choosing proper components
Maintaining tool center point
Adding to welding performance
Robotic GMAW gun maintenance
Bernard and Tregaskiss to Showcase Products at FABTECH 2015 in Chicago
Bernard and Tregaskiss to Showcase Products at FABTECH 2015 in Chicago
Accessories from Tregaskiss Extend Life of Popular TOUGH GUN TT3 Reamer, Complement Performance
Accessories from Tregaskiss Extend Life of Popular TOUGH GUN TT3 Reamer, Complement Performance
PRODUCT UPDATE – Expanded TOUGH GUN TA3 MIG Gun Offering
PRODUCT UPDATE —
Expanded TOUGH GUN TA3 MIG Gun Offering
Available Resources
Tips for Choosing the Right Contact Tip
Tips for Choosing the Right Contact Tip
Selecting the right material and bore size
Understanding contact tip recess
Recess/Extension Amperage Wire Stick-Out Process Notes 1/4-in. Recess > 200 1/2 – 3/4in. Spray, high-current pulse Metal-cored wired, spray transfer, argon-rich mixed gas 1/8-in. Recess > 200 1/2 – 3/4in. Spray, high-current pulse Metal-cored wired, spray transfer, argon-rich mixed gas Flush < 200 1/4 – 1/2in. Short-current, low-current pulse Low argon concentrations or 100 percent CO2 1/8-in. Extension < 200 1/4 in. Short-current, low-current pulse Difficult-to-access joints Extending contact tip life
PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT – Changes to Heavy Duty (HD) Nozzle Crimping
PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT –
Heavy Duty (HD) Nozzle Crimping
Affected Part Numbers
DISCONTINUED PRODUCT – Roughneck MIG Guns
DISCONTINUED PRODUCTS –
Miller Roughneck C-Series MIG GunsMiller Stock Number Roughneck Gun Model Number Bernard BTB MIG Gun Replacement Part Number Gun Length 194751 C-3010 10 ft. (3 m) 194752 C-3012 Q3012TE5EMC 194753 15 ft (4.6 m) 194754 C-4010 10 ft. (3 m) 194755 12 ft. (3.7 m) C-4015 Q4015TE5EMC 15 ft (4.6 m) C-5010 S5012GH5IMC 12 ft. (3.7 m) 194759 C-5015 15 ft. (4.6 m) Where To Order
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
FasTip Consumables 300 amp 400 amp 500 amp Quik Tip Consumables 300 amp 400 amp 500 amp 
PRODUCT UPDATE – Spray Containment
PRODUCT UPDATE —
Spray Containment
A perfect addition to the TOUGH GUN TT3 Reamer
Spray Containment Part Numbers
TS-1000-01 for use with Tregaskiss® Heavy Duty (HD) Nozzles (excluding 3/4″ bore) TS-1000-02 for use with Tregaskiss Standard Duty (SD) Nozzles TS-1000-03 for use with Tregaskiss Heavy Duty Nozzles with 3/4″ bore TS-1000-04 for use with Tregaskiss Heavy Duty Bottleneck Nozzles TS-1000-05 for use with Tregaskiss Standard Duty Bottleneck Nozzles New Automation Catalog Available from Tregaskiss
New Automation Catalog Available from Tregaskiss
Water-Cooled Robotic MIG Guns Can Reduce Consumable Costs and Downtime
Water-Cooled Robotic MIG Guns Can Reduce Consumable Costs and Downtime
Understanding water-cooled MIG guns
Selecting a water-cooled robotic MIG gun
Maintenance and usage tips
Consider the return on investment
Tregaskiss-Sponsored FIRST Robotics Team Attends World Competition
Tregaskiss-Sponsored FIRST Robotics Team Attends World Competition
Tregaskiss Sponsors Winning FIRST Robotics Team Headed to World Competition
Tregaskiss Sponsors Winning FIRST Robotics Team Headed to World Competition
Trends Associated with Robotic Welding Guns
Trends Associated with Robotic Welding Guns
The through-arm benefits
Increased cable durability, simplified replacement
Utilizing solid mounts
Creating more space, better joint access
More cooling options
Adding the extras
More to come
5 Things to Know About Robotic MIG Guns
5 Things to Know About Robotic MIG Guns
This article has been published as a web-exclusive on thefabricator.com. To read the entire story by Tregaskiss technical support specialist, Tom Whitter, please click here.
Money-Saving Tips for MIG Guns
Money-Saving Tips for MIG Guns
Tip No. 1: Protect the assets
Tip No. 2: Select the right neck
Tip No. 3: Perform regular inspections
Tip No. 4: Trim the liner properly
Tip No. 5: Select the best cable length for the job
Tip No. 6: Invest in consumables
Which is the Right MIG Gun? Tips for Making the Selection
Which is the Right MIG Gun? Tips for Making the Selection
Light- versus heavy-duty MIG guns
Air- versus Water-Cooled
Understanding and Extending Contact Tip Life
Understanding and Extending Contact Tip Life
Types of contact tip failure
Rectifying contact tip failure
• Properly selecting and installing the MIG gun liner
• Using shorter power cables when possible
• Eliminating loops or kinks in the power cable
• Using dust covers to protect the wire from contaminants that could clog the contact tip
The value of extending contact tip life
Tips for Making a MIG Gun Last on the Jobsite
Tips for Making a MIG Gun Last on the Jobsite
Choose a gun to fit the application
Some additional issues to consider when selecting a gun include:
Maintaining the gun
Care and maintenance can reduce costs
DISCONTINUED PRODUCT – TOUGH GARD Spatter Cleaner Robotic Nozzle Cleaning Station
DISCONTINUED PRODUCT — TOUGH GARD Spatter Cleaner Robotic Nozzle Cleaning Station
Equipment, Training, Maintenance and More: Best Practices for Successful Robotic Welding
Equipment, Training, Maintenance and More: Best Practices for Successful Robotic Welding
Manage parts and workflow
Protect against premature component failures
Don’t neglect maintenance?
• Checking for tight consumables connections.
• Confirming tool center point or TCP (discussed in more detail later).
• Checking for power cable wear and replacing as needed.
Always consider peripherals and robotic MIG gun extras
Stay on target
Find the right people
Protecting the investment
PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT – Bernard Conventional Liners
PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT –
Bernard Conventional Liners
Bernard has implemented a material change to all Bernard conventional liners. All liners were previously produced from high carbon music wire. All liners will now be produced from high carbon music wire with tin zinc plated coating. Wire Size Liner Color 15′ (4.57 m) 25′ (7.62 m)
**Standard Liner for 1/16″ Guns
